UK Intel Alerted Canada Before Nijjar’s Killing
British intelligence reportedly warned Canadian authorities about a potential threat to Hardeep Singh Nijjar months before the Khalistani separatist leader was assassinated in British Columbia. Sources reveal the UK’s MI6 shared details of a “plot” targeting Nijjar and two others, urging immediate action.
Hand-Delivered Warning Suggests High Sensitivity
The intelligence, deemed “highly sensitive,” was hand-delivered to Canadian officials in early 2023—a rare move signaling urgency. Nijjar, a designated terrorist by India, was the primary focus, with UK intel allegedly intercepting communications about coordinated efforts against him and two unnamed individuals.
Nijjar was shot dead outside a Surrey gurdwara on June 18, 2023. Canada’s PM Justin Trudeau later accused Indian agents of involvement, sparking a diplomatic crisis. India denied the claims as “absurd.”
Why Wasn’t Nijjar Protected?
Key questions remain:
– Did Canada underestimate the threat? Bureaucratic delays or low prioritization may have stalled action.
– Was Ottawa cautious to avoid tensions with India? Nijjar’s controversial status as a Khalistani activist could have influenced the response.
India’s Denial and Diplomatic Fallout
India dismissed Trudeau’s allegations, accusing Canada of sheltering extremists. The row led to tit-for-tat diplomat expulsions and frozen trade talks. The UK’s role—sharing intelligence but avoiding direct accusations—adds complexity to Western allies’ stance.
Broader Impact: Intelligence Sharing Under Scrutiny
The case exposes challenges in Five Eyes alliance cooperation:
– Sovereignty vs. collaboration: How should nations act on shared intel about extraterritorial threats?
– Hand-delivery significance: Suggests fears of interception, highlighting the plot’s sensitivity.
Next Steps
Canada faces pressure to prove India’s alleged role, while India demands action against Khalistani activists in Canada. The UK’s intermediary role could shape the outcome as investigations unfold.
—With inputs from sources familiar with the matter. Official responses may differ.
