Federal Judge: Trump’s National Guard Deployment to Portland Was Illegal
In a major rebuke of presidential authority, a U.S. judge ruled that former President Donald Trump unlawfully ordered National Guard troops to Portland, Oregon, during the 2020 racial justice protests. The decision by U.S. District Judge Michael Simon reaffirms constitutional limits on militarizing domestic law enforcement.
Why Did Trump Send Troops to Portland?
The ruling stems from the 2020 protests after George Floyd’s killing, when Portland became a hotspot for demonstrations. Trump deployed federal agents, including CBP and ICE officers, before authorizing National Guard troops—a move Oregon’s leaders called an overreach.
Key Legal Violations in the Ruling
Judge Simon found Trump’s order broke two critical laws:
1. Posse Comitatus Act: Bars using federal military for domestic policing without state consent.
2. First Amendment: Troops’ presence intimidated peaceful protesters, chilling free speech.
The judge noted no valid justification existed for federalizing the Guard, calling it an “unlawful escalation.”
Reactions to the Landmark Decision
- Supporters: Civil rights groups and Democrats praised the ruling as a check on presidential power.
- Critics: Trump allies called it a partisan attack, arguing the deployment was needed for public safety.
What This Means for Future Protests
The decision sets a precedent requiring state approval for federal military deployments, potentially limiting future presidents’ power during civil unrest.
Next Steps
While no penalties were issued, affected protesters may file lawsuits. The DOJ has yet to announce an appeal.
