Rajnath Singh Rejects Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Vote Chori’ Allegation
Defence Minister Rajnath Singh has strongly refuted Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s claims of electoral malpractice, terming the “vote chori” (vote theft) accusations “baseless.” Singh urged Gandhi to submit evidence to the Election Commission of India (ECI) instead of making public allegations. The BJP and Congress are locked in a heated exchange as the Lok Sabha elections near completion.
Background of the Controversy
During a rally in Uttar Pradesh, Rahul Gandhi alleged BJP manipulated EVMs and committed electoral fraud, accusing the party of “stealing votes.” The BJP swiftly denied the claims, calling them politically motivated.
Rajnath Singh responded, “Such statements disrespect India’s democracy. If Rahul Gandhi has proof, he must approach the ECI formally.” He stressed the ECI’s independence and Gandhi’s obligation to follow due process.
BJP Defends Electoral Integrity
The BJP reiterated its confidence in EVMs, citing ECI’s security measures. Singh asserted EVMs are tamper-proof, a claim backed by audits.
Union Minister Smriti Irani accused Gandhi of spreading misinformation: “Congress invents false narratives to mask its electoral failures.”
Congress Doubles Down on EVM Concerns
Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera demanded an EVM audit and stricter safeguards. “We seek transparency, not conspiracy theories,” he said.
Political experts note the allegations could sway undecided voters, though unsubstantiated claims risk damaging institutional trust.
ECI’s Assurance Amid Criticism
The ECI maintains its impartiality, highlighting VVPAT checks for EVM reliability. Former CEC S.Y. Quraishi advised formal complaints over rhetoric.
Conclusion: A Battle of Credibility
The BJP frames Gandhi’s claims as desperation; Congress insists on electoral scrutiny. Rajnath’s challenge shifts focus to Congress’s next move—whether to file ECI complaints or persist with public accusations.
As results approach, the ECI’s role remains pivotal. The controversy underscores India’s polarized politics, where trust in democracy is as contested as the elections themselves.
(Word count: 600)
