**
UP Govt Moves to Drop Dadri Lynching Case Amid Outrage
The Uttar Pradesh government has filed an application to withdraw the 2015 Dadri lynching case, citing the victim’s family’s “changing statements” and “no prior enmity” as key reasons. The move has triggered fierce criticism from activists, opposition leaders, and legal experts.
Dadri Lynching Case: A Tragic Flashpoint
On September 28, 2015, Mohammad Akhlaq, a 52-year-old Muslim man, was lynched by a mob in Bisada village over alleged beef consumption rumors. His son, Danish, suffered severe injuries in the attack. The incident became a symbol of rising communal violence in India, drawing global condemnation.
Why Does UP Govt Want to Withdraw the Case?
The state administration, led by Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath, claims the family’s inconsistent testimonies weaken the case. It also argues there was no premeditated hatred, framing the attack as a “spontaneous” act rather than communal violence.
Critics, however, allege political interference, pointing out that witness intimidation and trauma often lead to statement discrepancies. Legal experts warn that dropping such cases could embolden mob violence.
Political and Public Backlash
Opposition parties, including the Congress and Samajwadi Party, have condemned the move. Akhlaq’s family remains divided—some seek closure, while others demand justice. Human rights groups warn this could set a dangerous precedent.
What Happens Next?
The court will decide whether to accept the withdrawal plea. If approved, it could mark an unjust end to a case that once highlighted India’s struggle against mob violence. If rejected, it may force a re-examination of evidence.
The Dadri case remains a test of India’s commitment to justice and secular values.
(Stay updated with NextMinuteNews for developments.)
**
