Prince Andrew Dodges US Congress Request in Epstein Investigation
Prince Andrew, legally known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, has stirred fresh controversy by ignoring a formal summons from US lawmakers investigating Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking network. His refusal to respond has drawn sharp criticism, with legal analysts calling it a damaging move.
The Unanswered Congressional Summons
The US House Judiciary Committee, led by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), demanded testimony from Prince Andrew in late June about his ties to Epstein. The deadline passed this week without acknowledgment from the Duke of York or his legal team.
Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) blasted the snub: “His silence speaks volumes. Innocent people don’t evade questions.”
Prince Andrew’s Troubling Epstein Ties
The Duke’s association with Epstein has haunted him for years, including:
– A 2010 stay at Epstein’s Manhattan home post-conviction
– His disastrous 2019 BBC interview denying misconduct
– A £12M settlement with accuser Virginia Giuffre in 2022 (without admitting guilt)
Legal and Diplomatic Fallout
While congressional requests lack subpoena power, experts say Andrew’s silence worsens his reputation:
– Dr. Priya Nair, Historian: “This undermines the monarchy’s efforts to move past scandals.”
– Buckingham Palace: Maintains Andrew is a “private citizen” handling his own legal matters.
Public Outcry and Conspiracy Theories
Social media erupted with hashtags like #AndrewMustAnswer, while critics allege a broader cover-up among Epstein’s elite circles.
What Happens Next?
Options for US lawmakers:
1. Issue a subpoena (legally complex without UK cooperation)
2. Pursue diplomatic pressure
3. Highlight his non-compliance in hearings
For now, Andrew’s avoidance deepens skepticism—and victims’ demands for accountability.
Follow [Publication] for real-time updates on this case.
