BJP MP Pragya Thakur Advocates Violence Against Daughters in Interfaith Relationships
In a highly controversial statement, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Pragya Singh Thakur has ignited nationwide outrage by endorsing extreme violence against daughters who interact with non-Hindus. Speaking at an event in Madhya Pradesh, Thakur allegedly urged parents to “break the legs” of their daughters if they associate with people from other religions. The remarks have drawn severe criticism, reigniting debates on hate speech, gender violence, and religious intolerance in India.
What Did Pragya Thakur Say?
During a gathering in Bhopal, Thakur reportedly stated:
“If your daughter is meeting someone from another religion, stop her. If she doesn’t listen, break her legs. I say this as a Hindu woman.”
The statement, widely shared on social media, has been condemned for promoting physical abuse and communal division. This is not the first time Thakur has courted controversy—she has previously praised Mahatma Gandhi’s assassin, Nathuram Godse, and faced allegations in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case.
Political and Public Backlash
Opposition leaders, activists, and citizens have slammed Thakur’s remarks:
– Rahul Gandhi (Congress): Called it a reflection of BJP’s divisive ideology.
– Asaduddin Owaisi (AIMIM): Demanded PM Modi’s response, asking, “Will he condemn this call for violence?”
– Kavita Krishnan (Activist): Labeled the statement as “medieval brutality” and an incitement to violence.
BJP’s Silence Raises Questions
The BJP has not officially condemned Thakur’s remarks, leading to criticism. While some party members distanced themselves, the lack of strong action raises concerns about tacit approval of extremist rhetoric. Political analysts suggest this could be a strategic move to avoid alienating hardline Hindu voters.
Legal and Social Consequences
Legal experts argue Thakur’s comments may violate:
– IPC Section 153A (promoting enmity between groups).
– IPC Section 509 (insulting women’s modesty).
Women’s rights groups have demanded an First Information Report (FIR) against her, but no legal action has been taken yet. Sociologists warn that such statements reinforce patriarchal control under the guise of religious protection.
Public Reaction: Divided Opinions
Social media reactions are split:
– Critics: Call it hate speech and misogyny.
– Supporters: Defend it as “protecting Hindu culture.”
Conclusion: Will Hate Speech Face Accountability?
Pragya Thakur’s remarks highlight deep-rooted misogyny and communalism in Indian politics. The BJP’s response—or lack thereof—will be a test of its commitment to ethical governance. In a democracy that values equality, how long can such unchecked rhetoric persist?
Stay updated with NextMinuteNews for developments on this story.
