NSCN(IM) Reaffirms Naga Flag and Constitution as Non-Negotiable
The National Socialist Council of Nagalim (Isak-Muivah) or NSCN(IM) has firmly reiterated that the Naga flag and constitution are non-negotiable in ongoing peace talks with the Indian government. The group has also rejected any agreements that fail to recognize these demands, signaling a hardening stance in the decades-old conflict.
Why Flag and Constitution Are Core Demands
The NSCN(IM), the largest Naga insurgent group, views the Naga flag and Yehzabo (constitution) as symbols of Naga sovereignty. A senior NSCN(IM) leader stated:
“These represent the soul of the Naga people—any peace deal without them is a betrayal.”
For over 70 years, Nagas have sought self-determination, making these demands central to any political resolution.
Rejection of Previous Agreements
The group has dismissed the 2015 Framework Agreement with India, claiming the government has diluted its commitments. NSCN(IM) alleges Delhi now pushes for a solution under the Indian Constitution, which it refuses.
“We won’t accept any deal undermining our political identity,” the group declared.
Indian Government’s Challenge
India faces a dilemma: granting a separate flag and constitution could encourage other separatist movements. Union Home Minister Amit Shah insists any resolution must align with India’s constitutional framework.
However, NSCN(IM)’s latest stance reveals a growing trust deficit, complicating negotiations.
Divisions Among Naga Groups
While NSCN(IM) holds firm, other factions like the Naga National Political Groups (NNPGs) are open to a deal without the flag and constitution. This split gives Delhi leverage but also deepens rifts within the Naga movement.
Public Reaction in Nagaland
Opinions among Nagas are divided:
– Hardliners back NSCN(IM)’s stance.
– Pragmatists fear rigid demands may delay peace.
Civil society urges compromise, prioritizing stability over symbolism.
What’s Next for the Peace Process?
With NSCN(IM) refusing to bend, the peace process is at a stalemate. Analysts suggest backchannel talks may be key, but time is running out.
India must choose between:
✔ Unprecedented concessions (risking wider separatism).
✖ No deal (risking renewed conflict).
For NSCN(IM), accepting a weak agreement could split its base, while holding out may lead to isolation.
Conclusion
The NSCN(IM)’s latest statement highlights the complexity of the Naga issue. Without compromise, a lasting solution remains elusive.
Nagaland remains in suspense—between its people’s aspirations and the inflexibility of negotiators.
Follow for real-time updates on Naga peace talks.
