‘Pluribus’ Offers a Perfect World—But at What Cost?
In an era dominated by dystopian stories, Pluribus dares to imagine a utopian future—only to make it feel sterile and unengaging. Directed by Aarav Mehta, this sci-fi film presents a society free from conflict, but its polished perfection drains the life from its narrative.
A Flawless World, A Flawed Story
Set in 2150, Pluribus envisions a world where AI governance (“The Harmony Network”) has eliminated poverty, war, and inequality. Every decision—from careers to relationships—is optimized for collective happiness. On paper, this sounds fascinating. But the film’s execution turns its premise into a slow, uneventful slog.
The protagonist, Kavi (Priya Malhotra), is a “Harmony Architect” who begins noticing cracks in the system—subtle glitches hinting at suppressed human desires. Yet, instead of exploring rebellion in depth, Pluribus lingers on overly controlled, tension-free scenes.
Gorgeous but Emotionally Cold
Visually, Pluribus is a masterpiece. Production designer Riya Chatterjee crafts a futuristic world of sleek cities and manicured landscapes, evoking high-end tech advertisements. However, this aesthetic precision backfires—the world feels artificial, mirroring the film’s emotionally detached tone.
The score by A.R. Srinivasan amplifies this issue, relying on ambient sounds that reinforce monotony instead of building suspense. Even the climax, which should feel impactful, lacks urgency.
What Could Have Been
The film asks a compelling question: Is a perfect society worth sacrificing freedom? Yet, it never digs deep. Supporting characters feel underdeveloped, and their rebellions lack stakes. Compared to classics like Brave New World or The Giver, Pluribus sanitizes dissent, making its conflict feel preordained.
Aarav Mehta, known for The Last Monsoon, prioritizes aesthetics over storytelling here. While he calls Pluribus a “meditation on human potential,” it plays more like a visually striking but hollow thought experiment.
Audience and Critic Reactions
Early reviews are divided. Some praise its “bold minimalism,” while others, like Filmfare critic Rohit Nair, dismiss it as “a beautiful but empty experience.” Viewers echo this split:
- “Stunning but boring—like watching a screensaver for two hours.”
- “It’s not about action; it’s about reflection.”
Final Verdict: A Cautionary Tale About Playing It Safe
Pluribus is a technical marvel with little soul. While its vision of utopia is visually breathtaking, its lack of tension and emotional depth leaves audiences cold. For a film about the future, it feels oddly inert—a reminder that perfection isn’t always compelling.
Rating: 2.5/5
Would you watch a utopian film without conflict? Share your thoughts below!
