**
In a major administrative move, Himachal Pradesh Governor Shiv Pratap Shukla has sought a detailed explanation from Chief Secretary Prabodh Saxena regarding recent officiating appointments to top bureaucratic posts. The development highlights concerns over transparency and adherence to procedural norms in key state appointments.
Controversy Over Officiating Appointments
Raj Bhavan sources indicate the Governor raised objections after multiple senior roles—including in Finance, Public Works, and Urban Development—were filled on an officiating basis, allegedly bypassing standard protocols. Complaints suggest these appointments lacked proper scrutiny, with questions over whether seniority and merit were prioritized.
Governor’s Constitutional Role
As the appointing authority for top state posts, the Governor holds final approval power, though recommendations come from the Chief Secretary and state government. The intervention hints at a possible governor-administration rift, with the Raj Bhavan emphasizing “administrative fairness.” A senior official stated:
“The criteria for these appointments must be clarified to ensure due process.”
Political Backlash
The BJP opposition accused the Congress-led government of favoritism, with spokesperson Randhir Sharma calling it “arbitrary functioning.” Meanwhile, Congress leaders defended the moves as temporary measures for “administrative continuity,” pledging full cooperation with the Governor’s inquiry.
Expert Insights: Risks of Officiating Posts
Former Chief Secretary Vineet Chawdhry warned that prolonged officiating appointments could destabilize administration and demoralize officers. Legal experts stress such posts should only address short-term gaps—not bypass merit-based hiring.
Next Steps
Chief Secretary Saxena’s response, due soon, will determine whether appointments are reversed, potentially escalating tensions. The outcome could redefine bureaucratic appointment protocols in Himachal Pradesh.
For real-time updates, follow NextMinuteNews.
**
