IISc Bengaluru’s 80-Hour Workweek Rule Sparks Outcry Over “Spy-Like Surveillance”

The Indian Institute of Science (IISc) Bengaluru, one of India’s top research hubs, is facing fierce resistance after introducing a strict 80-hour workweek mandate for faculty members. The policy, aimed at boosting productivity, has been met with accusations of “Orwellian surveillance” and threats to academic freedom.

What Does IISc’s New 80-Hour Workweek Policy Say?

According to internal documents, IISc now requires faculty to log 80 hours of work per week, covering teaching, research, and administrative tasks. The rules include:
– Biometric attendance tracking
– Detailed activity logs submitted weekly
– Regular audits to ensure compliance

Critics argue that reducing academic work to hourly metrics ignores the creative and unpredictable nature of research. Many fear the policy will lead to burnout, stifled innovation, and faculty attrition.

Why Are Professors and Students Protesting?

The backlash has been swift, with faculty calling the policy “Big Brother-like” and students worrying about reduced mentorship. Key concerns include:
– Surveillance overkill: Biometric tracking and activity logs feel intrusive.
– Ignoring research realities: Breakthrough ideas often emerge outside rigid schedules.
– Trickle-down pressure: PhD scholars fear heavier workloads if professors are overburdened.

“Research isn’t about punching a clock,” said an anonymous professor. “This kills the spontaneity of discovery.”

IISc’s Defense: Aligning with “Global Standards”

The administration claims the policy mirrors expectations at top global universities, where high research output is non-negotiable. A spokesperson said:
– The system ensures accountability and transparency.
– It aims to elevate IISc’s global rankings and research impact.

However, opponents argue that global institutions offer better support, like:
– Reduced teaching loads
– More funding and staff
– Flexibility for deep research

Bigger Debate: Can Academic Work Be Quantified?

The controversy highlights a broader tension in Indian academia:
– Pro: Structured accountability may increase productivity.
– Con: Forcing rigid hours on intellectual labor risks killing creativity.

“Will this improve research or just create burnout?” asked an education expert.

What’s Next for IISc?

With protests growing, the institute may need to:
1. Revise the policy (e.g., exempt research-focused faculty).
2. Add compensatory measures like hiring more staff.
3. Open dialogue with dissenting faculty.

For now, this clash serves as a warning for Indian academia—balancing productivity and freedom is key to nurturing world-class research.

What’s your take? Should research institutions enforce strict work-hour rules? Share your thoughts below.

— NextMinuteNews Team