Centre Postpones Chandigarh Bill Amid Political Tensions
The Central government has confirmed it will not introduce the controversial Chandigarh bill during the upcoming winter session of Parliament. This decision follows mounting pressure from Punjab’s ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and regional stakeholders demanding Chandigarh retain its status as a shared capital between Punjab and Haryana.
Why Chandigarh’s Status Is Contentious
Chandigarh, a Union Territory, has been a longstanding dispute between Punjab and Haryana since Haryana’s formation in 1966. The city serves as a joint capital for both states under a complex administrative arrangement.
- Punjab’s Claim: Argues for full ownership based on historical and demographic grounds.
- Haryana’s Stand: Seeks clearer division of assets and governance.
Earlier reports of a potential bill redefining Chandigarh’s framework triggered protests from Punjab’s AAP and Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD), who viewed it as an attempt to weaken Punjab’s claim.
Reasons Behind the Delay
Government sources cite the need for broader stakeholder consultations. A senior official stated:
“The matter requires careful deliberation to avoid unnecessary friction.”
Political analysts suggest the Centre may be avoiding confrontation ahead of 2024 state elections. Punjab’s AAP government, led by CM Bhagwant Mann, has strongly opposed any changes to Chandigarh’s status.
Mixed Reactions from Political Parties
- AAP: Welcomed the deferral but remains vigilant. Punjab Finance Minister Harpal Singh Cheema asserted: “Chandigarh belongs to Punjab; any alteration will face resistance.”
- Haryana BJP: Urged a “fair legal resolution,” while Congress leader Bhupinder Singh Hooda demanded clarity to prevent unrest.
What’s Next?
With the bill shelved for winter, focus shifts to whether the Centre will revisit the issue in the budget session or post-2024 elections.
