CJI Chandrachud Questions Centre’s Motive in Supreme Court Clash
In a fiery hearing on Tuesday, Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud openly rebuked the Central government’s demand for a five-judge constitution bench, suggesting the Centre might be attempting to bypass his bench. The remark came during a heated exchange over a sensitive case, reigniting debates about judicial independence.
Why Did the Centre Request a 5-Judge Bench?
The government, represented by Attorney General R. Venkataramani, argued that the case involved “substantial constitutional questions” requiring a larger bench. However, the CJI-led bench—including Justices P.S. Narasimha and J.B. Pardiwala—expressed skepticism, with Chandrachud stating:
“It seems the government wants to avoid my bench. If you have an issue with this bench, say so explicitly.”
Legal experts speculate the case could involve electoral reforms, federalism, or executive powers, though details remain undisclosed.
History of “Bench Fixing” Allegations
This isn’t the first time the Modi government has faced accusations of influencing bench assignments. In 2018, four senior SC judges held a historic press conference, raising similar concerns. The CJI’s remarks have now revived those tensions.
Government’s Defense & Legal Reactions
The Attorney General denied any bias, calling the request procedural. Yet, senior lawyers like Prashant Bhushan and Gopal Subramanium noted the timing was suspect, with Bhushan tweeting:
“CJI’s statement reflects judiciary’s unease over executive interference. Independence is non-negotiable.”
Political Fallout: Opposition vs. BJP
- Congress’s Shashi Tharoor: “Alarming attempts to manipulate courts.”
- BJP’s Nalin Kohli: “A non-issue; government respects judiciary.”
What’s Next?
The Supreme Court deferred a decision, but the showdown has broader implications:
- If the CJI’s bench hears the case, it asserts judicial authority.
- If a 5-judge bench forms, transparency concerns will linger.
Why This Matters for Indian Democracy
The clash underscores the judiciary’s role as a check on executive power. With the CJI taking a firm stand, the outcome could shape India’s institutional balance.
Follow [Publication Name] for real-time updates.
