Delhi Police Alleges Pre-Planned Violence in Court Submission
In a dramatic court submission, the Delhi Police claimed protesters detained during a recent demonstration were “fully prepared” for violence—allegedly carrying pepper spray and chanting slogans supporting banned Maoist leader Hidma. The accusations have intensified scrutiny around protest tactics and legal consequences under anti-terror laws.
Key Allegations: Weapons and Hidma Slogans
During a remand hearing, police asserted protesters were equipped with pepper spray, which they used against officers. Most controversially, authorities cited chants praising Hidma, a top CPI (Maoist) commander, potentially invoking the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). Legal experts note such charges could lead to extended detention without bail.
Protest Context: Clashing Narratives
The demonstration targeted a disputed government policy, but accounts diverge sharply:
– Organizers insist it was peaceful.
– Police describe a coordinated, violent mobilization.
Eyewitnesses and social media footage show scuffles but offer no clear proof of Hidma-linked slogans.
Political and Legal Fallout
Opposition leaders accuse the government of criminalizing dissent, while rights groups warn of UAPA’s misuse. “Labeling protesters as Maoists without evidence undermines democracy,” argued a civil rights advocate.
Public Divide and Next Steps
Media coverage remains split:
– Some outlets emphasize “extremist infiltration.”
– Others demand transparency, citing families’ claims of wrongful detention.
The court has sought concrete evidence from police, with the outcome likely influencing future protest policing.
