**
The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has issued a major clarification on the controversial Chandigarh bill, stating it has “no intention to alter the existing administrative framework” of the Union Territory. The move comes after strong opposition from political parties, particularly in Punjab, who accused the Centre of undermining the state’s rights over Chandigarh.
Chandigarh Bill Sparks Political Uproar
The proposed amendments to the Chandigarh (Union Territory) Act triggered backlash from Punjab’s ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) and the Congress, who alleged the Centre was attempting to weaken Punjab’s claim over the city—Chandigarh serves as the shared capital of Punjab and Haryana.
Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann termed the bill an “assault on federalism,” citing the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966, which designated Chandigarh as Punjab’s capital post-state division. Congress leaders echoed concerns, accusing the BJP-led government of sidelining Punjab’s interests.
MHA’s Key Clarification: No Change in Chandigarh’s Status
In response, the MHA released an official statement:
“The amendments are administrative, aimed at improving governance efficiency. There is no intent to alter Chandigarh’s status as the joint capital of Punjab and Haryana.”
The ministry stressed the changes were procedural (e.g., streamlining bureaucracy) and not related to territorial rights. The clarification sought to counter opposition claims of a “hidden agenda.”
Legal & Historical Background of Chandigarh Dispute
Chandigarh’s unique status has been contentious since its inception:
– 1947: Became Punjab’s capital post-Partition.
– 1966: Declared a Union Territory and shared capital after Punjab’s reorganization.
Legal experts note that altering Chandigarh’s status would require Parliament approval and consultations with Punjab and Haryana. The MHA’s statement suggests the bill avoids reopening these debates, focusing instead on governance tweaks.
Mixed Political Reactions Post-Clarification
- AAP’s Raghav Chadha welcomed the clarification but demanded written assurances.
- BJP’s Sunil Jakhar accused opponents of “fearmongering for electoral gains.”
What’s Next?
The bill will proceed for discussion, but with Punjab elections approaching, the AAP government is likely to monitor developments closely.
Conclusion
While the MHA’s statement has cooled tensions, the episode highlights the fragility of India’s federal balance. The Centre’s assurances may face scrutiny until concrete steps are taken to uphold Chandigarh’s current status.
Stay updated on this story with NextMinuteNews.
**
