Centre Clarifies “No Final Decision” on Chandigarh Bill
The Centre has stated that “no final decision” has been made regarding the contentious Chandigarh Bill, following weeks of heated debates and political unrest. The clarification comes amid speculation that the government plans to alter the administrative framework of Chandigarh, the shared capital of Punjab and Haryana.
What’s Behind the Chandigarh Bill Controversy?
The Chandigarh Union Territory (Amendment) Bill proposes changes to the city’s governance, potentially increasing central control while reducing the powers of the elected municipal body. Critics argue this undermines federalism, especially for Punjab, which has long claimed Chandigarh as its rightful capital.
Key Opposition:
– Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann (AAP) calls it an “attack on Punjab’s rights.”
– Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) & Congress have joined protests.
– AAP’s Raghav Chadha tweeted, “Chandigarh belongs to Punjab. Any dilution will be resisted.”
Centre’s Response: Discussions Ongoing
The Union Home Ministry clarified that the bill is “under consideration,” with stakeholders to be consulted before any decision. However, sceptics question the timing, fearing unilateral action.
Why is Chandigarh a Flashpoint?
Chandigarh’s status has been disputed since 1966, when Haryana was carved out of Punjab. The city was kept as a shared capital, but Punjab demands full control. Decades later, the issue remains unresolved, fueling political tensions.
Political & Legal Implications
- Opposition Accusations: BJP faces backlash for “bypassing democracy.”
- Haryana’s Stance: CM Nayab Singh Saini urges a “balanced approach.”
- Legal Debate: Can Parliament unilaterally amend Chandigarh’s governance? Experts are divided.
What’s Next?
With no final decision yet, negotiations between Punjab, Haryana, and the Centre will continue. The outcome could shape India’s federal dynamics—or trigger a deeper crisis.
Stay updated with NextMinuteNews for real-time coverage.
