MLA Calls for Separate North Karnataka State Amid Growing Disparities
In a bold move reigniting decades-old demands, a Karnataka MLA has advocated for bifurcating the state to create a separate North Karnataka region. The proposal has sparked intense debates, with supporters highlighting systemic neglect and opponents warning of administrative challenges.
Why a Separate State? MLA’s Justification
Speaking at a public event in [City/Town], [MLA’s Name] argued that North Karnataka has long been overlooked in infrastructure, employment, and economic growth compared to southern hubs like Bengaluru, Mysuru, and Mangaluru.
“Despite contributing significantly to state revenue through agriculture, mining, and industries, North Karnataka remains underdeveloped. Separate statehood is the only way to ensure equitable progress,” the MLA stated.
The demand for “Uttara Karnataka” or “Kalyana Karnataka” dates back to the 1950s, but recent unemployment and farmer distress have renewed momentum.
Historical Neglect: Key Grievances
Formed in 1956 under the States Reorganisation Act, Karnataka merged diverse regions, yet critics accuse governments of prioritizing Bengaluru and the south. Major issues include:
– Water Scarcity: Incomplete irrigation projects despite rivers like Krishna and Bhima.
– Industrial Gap: Lack of large-scale industries compared to Bengaluru’s tech boom.
– Education & Healthcare: Few premier institutions; rural talukas lack quality hospitals.
Political Reactions: Support and Skepticism
While the ruling Congress and opposition BJP acknowledge regional disparities, responses are mixed. Some dismiss the demand as politically motivated, while activists argue past promises—like special status for Hyderabad-Karnataka—failed to deliver.
“Focus on balanced development, not division,” urged [Opposition Leader’s Name].
Public Divide: Hopes vs. Fears
- Supporters: Farmers and youth hope for jobs and investment.
- Opponents: Business owners fear administrative disruptions.
“Telangana prospered post-division—why not us?” asked a Dharwad student, while a Belagavi entrepreneur countered, “Better governance, not separation, is the answer.”
Legal Challenges and Next Steps
Under Article 3 of the Constitution, parliamentary approval is required. Experts suggest interim measures:
– Expedite irrigation and rail projects.
– Boost industries in Hubballi-Dharwad and Kalaburagi.
– Strengthen decentralized governance.
Conclusion: Governance or Division?
While statehood demands reflect real inequities, improved governance may be the solution. If unaddressed, North Karnataka’s separatist sentiment could reshape the state’s future.
Follow NextMinuteNews for updates.
