**
Owaisi’s Unambiguous Condemnation
In a political landscape often clouded by spin, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi delivered a moment of stark clarity following the Rameshwaram Cafe blast investigation. Reacting to reports that the bomber viewed his act as a “suicide mission,” Owaisi’s rebuttal was swift and absolute, framing the attack as “terrorism, nothing else.” His statement aimed to dismantle any attempt by the perpetrator to glorify a heinous crime.
The Breakthrough in the Bengaluru Blast Case
Owaisi’s comments came after a major breakthrough in the March 1st bombing at Bengaluru’s popular Rameshwaram Cafe, which injured ten people. In a coordinated operation, the National Investigation Agency (NIA) successfully tracked down and arrested the alleged masterminds, Mussavir Hussain Shazib and Abdul Matheen Taha, near Kolkata.
During the subsequent investigation, a chilling detail emerged. Shazib, the alleged IED planter, reportedly told an associate he was prepared for a “suicide bombing.” Though he escaped the scene, his stated intent revealed a mindset rooted in extremist ideology, seeking a twisted form of martyrdom through violence against innocent civilians.
Demolishing the Extremist Narrative
It was this specific detail that Owaisi targeted with surgical precision. By trashing the bomber’s self-perception, the Hyderabad MP performed a crucial act of narrative demolition. Extremist groups often use terms like “jihad” or “suicide bombing” to cloak their crimes in a veneer of religious purpose, elevating criminals to the status of ideological warriors.
Owaisi’s “terrorism, nothing else” is a powerful rejection of this framework. He forcefully delinked the criminal act from the faith the perpetrator claimed to represent. The message was unequivocal: there is no honour, no martyrdom, and no religious sanction for planting a bomb in a cafe. There is only crime and terror.
Countering the Communal Polarisation
This statement carries profound political implications. In the aftermath of such attacks, political discourse in India often descends into a predictable pattern of accusations, with entire communities put on the defensive.
By being one of the most prominent Muslim leaders to issue such a stark condemnation, Owaisi preempted the communal narrative. His words served as a clear signal:
* To his community: A directive to reject any justification for extremism.
* To political opponents: A challenge that strips them of the ability to paint the community with a broad, terror-sympathising brush.
* To the nation: A call to view terrorism as a unified national security threat, not a Hindu-Muslim issue.
In an age of constant whataboutery, Asaduddin Owaisi’s terse dismissal was a masterclass in communication. It refused to engage with the bomber’s deluded self-image, denied the act any ideological oxygen, and framed it for exactly what it was: a cowardly and unforgivable crime.
**
