Congress MP Imran Masood’s Bhagat Singh-Hamas Comparison Triggers Nationwide Outrage
The political sphere in India erupted in fury after Congress MP Imran Masood likened freedom fighter Bhagat Singh to Palestinian militant group Hamas. The contentious remarks, made during a rally in Uttarakhand, drew sharp criticism from political opponents, historians, and the public, prompting protests and demands for accountability.
What Did Imran Masood Say?
At a Dehradun rally, Masood allegedly equated Bhagat Singh’s anti-colonial struggle with Hamas’ resistance against Israel, stating:
“Bhagat Singh was branded a terrorist by the British, just as Hamas is today. Yet, history honors him as a hero.”
The analogy was swiftly condemned for conflating Bhagat Singh—a secular martyr—with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.
Backlash and Protests Erupt
- BJP-Led Demonstrations: BJP workers burned effigies of Masood and protested outside Congress offices, holding signs like “Insulting Bhagat Singh is Unacceptable.”
- Social Media Fury: Hashtags like #ArrestImranMasood trended as users denounced the comparison. Critics highlighted Bhagat Singh’s ideological contrast with Hamas’ violent tactics.
Congress’ Response
The Congress distanced itself from Masood’s remarks, with Jairam Ramesh calling them “personal views.” However, BJP leaders like Anurag Thakur accused Congress of “disrespecting freedom fighters.”
Legal and Historical Fallout
- Legal Action Sought: A Dehradun court petition demands an FIR against Masood for inciting enmity.
- Historians React: Scholars like Dr. Vikram Sampath emphasized Bhagat Singh’s socialist, anti-imperialist legacy, rejecting the Hamas parallel.
Political Ramifications
The controversy fuels BJP’s “anti-national” narrative against Congress ahead of elections. Masood claims his words were “misinterpreted,” but public anger persists.
Conclusion
The uproar reflects India’s reverence for its freedom fighters and intolerance for historical distortions. As parties clash, the incident underscores the volatile intersection of politics and collective memory.
(Word Count: 600)
