SC Rejects Blanket Protection for Doctors, Suggests High Court Transfer
In a crucial ruling, the Supreme Court of India declined to grant blanket legal protection to junior doctors protesting against alleged assaults at Kolkata’s RG Kar Medical College. However, the bench indicated it may transfer the case to the Calcutta High Court, emphasizing the need for local resolution.
Why Are Doctors Protesting?
The uproar began after junior doctors were allegedly attacked by relatives of a deceased patient at RG Kar Medical College. The incident triggered statewide protests, with doctors demanding enhanced security and stricter laws to safeguard medical professionals.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee initially warned protesting doctors of disciplinary action, but following nationwide outrage, the state promised tighter hospital security measures.
Key Takeaways from Supreme Court Hearing
A bench comprising Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah heard a plea from doctors seeking protection from coercive action. The court refused a blanket order, stating:
“We cannot grant general immunity to all protesting doctors. Each case must be evaluated individually.”
The judges noted that the Calcutta High Court might be better suited to handle the case due to its localized nature.
Government and Medical Bodies Respond
- West Bengal Govt: Assured no action against peaceful protesters but warned against violence or service disruptions.
- IMA (Indian Medical Association): Supported the potential High Court transfer but expressed disappointment over lack of blanket protection.
Political and Public Reactions
- Opposition parties (BJP, CPI-M)) criticized the state’s initial heavy-handed response.
- Public opinion remains split—while many back doctors’ demands, others argue patient care should not suffer.
Next Steps in the Legal Battle
If the case moves to the Calcutta High Court, it will examine:
1. Whether protesting doctors were unfairly targeted.
2. Potential violations of fundamental rights.
3. Systemic issues like hospital security and grievance redressal.
The Supreme Court has urged all parties to maintain peace and ensure uninterrupted healthcare services.
Final Verdict: Balancing Rights and Responsibilities
The court’s decision underscores the need to balance doctors’ rights with patient welfare. As the case potentially shifts to the Calcutta HC, the focus will be on finding a long-term solution to prevent such conflicts.
Follow [Your News Outlet] for real-time updates on this case.
