States Challenge Trump Administration Over Food Stamp Cuts
A coalition of 14 states and Washington, D.C., has filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration over its plan to cut food stamp benefits for nearly 700,000 people. The lawsuit aims to block controversial new SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) rules that critics say will worsen hunger and poverty nationwide.
What’s Changing with SNAP Rules?
In December 2019, the USDA finalized a rule tightening work requirements for “able-bodied adults without dependents” (ABAWDs) aged 18–49. Under the new policy:
– Recipients must work 20+ hours per week or join job training programs.
– States can no longer waive requirements in high-unemployment areas.
The Trump administration claims the rule promotes self-sufficiency, while opponents argue it ignores economic challenges in struggling regions.
Why Are States Suing?
Led by New York Attorney General Letitia James, the lawsuit argues that the USDA:
– Exceeded its authority by bypassing Congress.
– Violated federal law, as similar proposals were rejected in the 2018 Farm Bill.
AG James called the policy “cruel and unlawful,” warning it would push vulnerable Americans deeper into poverty.
Who Will Be Hit Hardest?
The cuts could severely impact:
– Veterans and homeless individuals
– People with undiagnosed mental health issues
– Low-income workers in areas with few jobs
Advocates warn the changes will strain food banks and increase homelessness, reversing years of anti-hunger progress.
Legal and Political Fallout
The lawsuit is part of a broader conflict between Democratic-led states and the Trump administration. Key developments include:
– Potential injunction to delay the April 1, 2020, effective date.
– Congressional Democrats pledging to reverse the rule via the Congressional Review Act.
What Happens Next?
With legal battles ahead, SNAP recipients face uncertainty. Food banks are preparing for higher demand, while advocates urge affected individuals to check eligibility for local aid programs.
Follow updates on this developing story as courts weigh in on the future of food assistance.
