Supreme Court Rules Tamil Nadu’s Mekedatu Plea ‘Premature’
In a key decision, the Supreme Court dismissed Tamil Nadu’s plea against Karnataka’s Mekedatu reservoir project, calling it “premature.” The court noted that since the project is still in planning, Tamil Nadu’s objections are premature at this stage.
The dispute centers on Karnataka’s proposed Rs. 9,000-crore Mekedatu dam, intended to supply drinking water to Bengaluru and generate hydroelectric power. Tamil Nadu argues the project would disrupt Cauvery River flows, violating water-sharing agreements.
Mekedatu Project: Key Background
- Location: Confluence of Cauvery & Arkavathi rivers (Karnataka)
- Purpose: Drinking water for Bengaluru & hydropower generation
- Dispute: Tamil Nadu fears reduced water flow, harming agriculture
- Legal Basis: 2018 Supreme Court allocation (404.25 TMC to TN, 284.75 TMC to Karnataka)
Why Did the Supreme Court Reject Tamil Nadu’s Plea?
A bench of Justices A.M. Khanwilkar and C.T. Ravikumar stated:
– No final approvals have been granted to Karnataka yet.
– Tamil Nadu can challenge the project after clearances are issued.
– The Cauvery Water Management Authority (CWMA) should first assess compliance.
Political Reactions from Tamil Nadu & Karnataka
- Tamil Nadu: Water Minister Duraimurugan vowed to continue opposing the project, calling it a “threat to farmers.”
- Karnataka: CM Basavaraj Bommai welcomed the verdict, assuring adherence to legal processes.
What Happens Next?
- Tamil Nadu may approach the CWMA if Karnataka proceeds without approvals.
- Karnataka will push for environmental & central clearances.
- Protests likely in TN, while Bengaluru’s water demands escalate.
Broader Implications for Inter-State Water Disputes
The case highlights India’s ongoing water-sharing conflicts and the need for better dispute resolution frameworks. While Karnataka sees this as a win, legal battles may continue.
