Supreme Court Pressures Trump Admin on SNAP Benefits Appeal
The U.S. Supreme Court has directed the Trump administration to move quickly if it plans to appeal a lower court’s decision blocking stricter work requirements for SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) recipients. The ruling affects millions of Americans depending on food stamps during an ongoing economic crisis.
What’s at Stake?
The Trump administration’s 2019 rule aimed to tighten work mandates for able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs), potentially cutting 700,000 people from SNAP. A federal judge later struck down the rule, calling it “arbitrary and capricious” during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Supreme Court’s Message: No Emergency Stay
The justices denied an emergency stay but gave the administration a tight deadline to appeal properly. Legal experts say the Court’s refusal signals doubt about the rule’s legality.
Impact on SNAP Recipients
With the injunction in place, states can still waive work requirements—critical as unemployment remains high. Over 42 million Americans rely on SNAP, with enrollment rising sharply since 2020.
Biden Administration’s Likely Move
President-elect Biden has pledged to expand SNAP benefits, and his team may drop the appeal, effectively ending the rule. Meanwhile, advocates celebrate the delay as a win for food security.
What Happens Next?
The Trump administration must file an appeal soon or lose its chance. Given Biden’s incoming policies, the rule’s future looks uncertain.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s order highlights the urgent debate over food assistance in America. For now, SNAP remains intact, but its future hinges on legal and political decisions in the coming weeks.
