Paresh Rawal’s Taj: Divided by Blood Sparks Legal Showdown
The Indian film industry is no stranger to controversies, but when a dispute over creative rights reaches the Delhi High Court, it demands attention. Veteran actor Paresh Rawal is at the center of a legal storm involving the upcoming web series Taj: Divided by Blood, with writers Abbas Dalal and Hussain Dalal alleging script theft. The case raises critical questions about intellectual property (IP) rights, ethical filmmaking, and the blurred lines between historical adaptation and plagiarism.
The Core of the Controversy
The dispute revolves around Taj: Divided by Blood, a ZEE5 original series exploring Mughal Emperor Akbar’s succession battles. The Dalals claim they shared a script titled Taj Story with Rawal’s team in 2019 but were later excluded from the project. They allege their work was adapted without credit or compensation, leading them to file a lawsuit.
The Delhi High Court must now determine whether the series infringes on the Dalals’ IP or if it’s a case of coincidental inspiration—a common challenge in historical dramas.
Paresh Rawal’s Defense: Public Domain vs. Plagiarism
Rawal and the producers deny wrongdoing, arguing that Akbar’s life is well-documented history, making exclusive claims to the narrative untenable. Their legal team asserts:
- The series draws from public domain sources, not the Dalals’ script.
- No formal agreement existed between the parties.
- Historical epics inherently overlap in themes and plotlines.
Legal experts note that proving plagiarism in such cases is difficult unless the plaintiffs can show unique, copyrighted elements were copied.
Bollywood’s IP Problem: A Recurring Nightmare
This isn’t Bollywood’s first script theft dispute (Jolly LLB 2, Barfi!), but it underscores systemic issues:
- Lack of formal agreements – Many writers pitch ideas informally, leaving no legal trail.
- Gray areas in historical adaptations – When does inspiration become infringement?
- Weak writer protections – Industry norms often favor producers over creators.
A ruling favoring the Dalals could enforce stricter submission protocols (e.g., NDAs, contracts). Conversely, a win for Rawal may encourage more historical retellings without legal fears.
Public and Industry Backlash
Reactions are polarized:
- Pro-writers: “Credit where it’s due—protect creators’ rights.”
- Pro-producers: “History can’t be copyrighted; this is a frivolous case.”
Rawal has stayed silent, likely on legal advice, but the verdict could impact his producing career and the series’ release.
What’s Next?
With the Delhi High Court set to hear arguments soon, the outcome could reshape Bollywood’s approach to IP. For now, the case serves as a stark reminder: documentation is key to avoiding courtroom dramas.
Follow NextMinuteNews for real-time updates on this developing story.
