**
Trump’s Milei Endorsement: A Departure from ‘America First’?
Former President Donald Trump’s recent backing of far-right Argentine leader Javier Milei has sparked debate over whether his foreign policy still aligns with the “America First” doctrine. While Trump’s supporters praise his focus on U.S. interests, his embrace of Milei—a radical libertarian with destabilizing economic plans—suggests a shift toward ideological alliances over practical strategy.
Why Milei Poses a Risk to U.S. Interests
Javier Milei, Argentina’s self-described “anarcho-capitalist” president, has proposed extreme measures like dollarizing the economy, dismantling the central bank, and severe austerity. While these policies appeal to libertarians, economists warn they could trigger an economic collapse in Argentina—a key Latin American partner.
Historically, instability in the region leads to:
– Mass migration straining U.S. borders
– Increased crime and regional insecurity
– Power vacuums exploited by rivals like China and Russia
Trump’s endorsement contradicts “America First” principles, which should prioritize stability over ideological experiments.
China Stands to Gain from Milei’s Policies
Trump’s foreign policy has long emphasized countering China’s influence, yet Milei’s potential economic mismanagement could play into Beijing’s hands. If Argentina’s economy falters, China may step in with loans and infrastructure deals, as it did in Venezuela.
Past Precedent: Venezuela’s crisis under Maduro pushed it into China’s orbit. If Milei fails, Argentina could follow, weakening U.S. leverage in Latin America.
Trump’s Motives: Politics Over Policy?
Trump’s support for Milei appears driven by:
1. Shared anti-establishment rhetoric (both leaders thrive on controversy)
2. Appealing to the global far-right ahead of the 2024 election
But true “America First” leadership would demand cautious foreign engagements—not risky bets on unproven leaders.
Biden’s More Measured Approach
The Biden administration has taken a cautious stance toward Milei, avoiding sweeping endorsements. While not perfect, this approach reflects a recognition that impulsive alliances can backfire strategically.
Conclusion: Ideology vs. U.S. Interests
Trump’s Milei gamble highlights a conflict between personal branding and national strategy. If “America First” means putting U.S. security and influence first, backing volatile foreign leaders is a misstep.
Latin America needs stability—not experiments that benefit China. If Trump wants to reclaim his doctrine, he must reassess his foreign policy priorities.
**
