WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a development signaling aggressive preparations for a potential second term, key officials and loyalists from Donald Trump‘s inner circle have reportedly begun moving into military-provided residences in the Washington D.C. area. This unprecedented step is being viewed as the establishment of a government-in-waiting, strategically positioned just outside the White House.
What’s Happening on D.C. Military Bases?
Sources familiar with the matter report that aides and policy advisors are taking up housing in facilities typically reserved for high-ranking military personnel, including those at Fort McNair and Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling. This is a significant departure from the traditional post-administration path, where former officials often transition into the private sector or join conservative think tanks while planning a potential return to government.
By co-locating key personnel in secure, federally-owned facilities, the Trump camp is creating a centralized command center for its transition efforts while bypassing the logistical challenge of expensive D.C. housing.
A Central Hub for ‘Project 2025‘
This move is widely interpreted as a physical manifestation of Project 2025, the comprehensive transition plan developed by the Heritage Foundation to enable a swift and immediate conservative takeover of the federal government should Trump win the November election. Housing officials together allows for streamlined coordination and strategy sessions, effectively creating a “war room” for enacting their agenda from day one.
Blurring Lines: Pentagon and Political Backlash
The arrangement has ignited a firestorm of criticism from opponents who argue it dangerously blurs the sacred line between civilian politics and the traditionally apolitical U.S. military. Using military facilities to house a partisan political operation, they contend, sets a disturbing precedent and risks politicizing the armed forces.
A Pentagon source, speaking on the condition of anonymity, expressed deep unease. “The uniform is meant to serve the constitution, not a political party or a candidate,” the source stated. “This creates an optic that is deeply uncomfortable for many in leadership.”
A ‘Practical’ Move or a Statement of Intent?
Supporters of the former President defend the arrangement as a practical and fiscally responsible measure. They argue these officials are preparing to serve the country and that utilizing available government resources is an efficient way to ensure a smooth transition of power.
Regardless of the justification, the optics are powerful. The move signals that the Trump team is not just campaigning for a victory but is already strategizing its first 100 days from secure, strategic locations. As the election approaches, this “shadow government” operating from within the D.C. military complex will remain a focal point of national debate and international observation.
