U.S. Supreme Court Halts Full SNAP Benefits in Late-Night Ruling
In a dramatic late-night decision, the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the Biden administration’s plan to continue full Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for millions of low-income Americans. The emergency order, issued amid record inflation and food insecurity, has drawn sharp criticism from anti-hunger groups and Democrats while Republicans applaud it as a curb on executive overreach.
Why Did the Supreme Court Block SNAP Aid?
The case began when 14 Republican-led states sued the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), arguing it lacked authority to extend emergency SNAP benefits beyond the COVID-19 public health emergency. A Texas federal judge initially ruled against the USDA, prompting the Biden administration to appeal to the Supreme Court.
In a 6-3 decision, the Court’s conservative majority granted an emergency stay, freezing the expanded payments. Justices Kavanaugh, Barrett, and Roberts dissented, warning of dire consequences for food-insecure families.
How Will This Affect SNAP Recipients?
An estimated 16 million households (40 million Americans) will see their benefits cut by $82 per person monthly starting next month. Advocates warn this could force families to choose between food, rent, and medicine.
“Children will go hungry because of this ruling,” said Emily Ruskin of the National Food Security Coalition. “This isn’t just policy—it’s survival.”
Political Reactions to the SNAP Ruling
- Democrats: Called the decision “heartless,” citing rising grocery costs. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) labeled it “judicial activism.”
- Republicans: Praised the ruling, with Rep. Jim Banks (R-IN) stating “SNAP wasn’t meant to be permanent.”
What Happens Next for Food Aid?
- States: California and New York announced state-funded assistance programs.
- Congress: Unlikely to reinstate benefits due to GOP opposition in the House.
Legal Precedent and Future Challenges
Legal experts say the ruling could limit executive power over welfare programs. “Agencies can’t bypass Congress,” noted constitutional scholar Mark Tushnet.
Millions now face heightened food insecurity as battles over SNAP continue in courts and legislatures.
