Uttarakhand Foundation Day: 25 Years On, the Capital Question Still Unanswered

On November 9, 2000, Uttarakhand was carved out of Uttar Pradesh to become India’s 27th state. As the state celebrates its 25th Foundation Day, the jubilation is shadowed by an unresolved debate: Where should Uttarakhand’s permanent capital be?

For 25 years, the state has operated with a temporary setup—Dehradun as the interim capital and Gairsain as the proposed permanent capital. Despite political promises and public protests, the issue lingers, leaving Uttarakhand in uncertainty.

The Birth of Uttarakhand and the Capital Conundrum

The demand for Uttarakhand stemmed from hill communities’ aspirations for better governance and identity. Yet, the capital debate began immediately:

• Dehradun: Chosen as the interim capital for its infrastructure, connectivity, and administrative readiness.
• Gairsain: Proposed as the permanent capital to balance development between hills and plains, ensuring governance reaches remote areas.

While Gairsain symbolized decentralization, governments have delayed a final decision, fueling frustration.

Political Ping-Pong: Broken Promises and Delays

The capital issue has become a political battleground:

• BJP’s Pledges: Promised to declare Gairsain the capital; in 2020, the Trivendra Singh Rawat government held a legislative session there—but no formal announcement followed.
• Congress’ Hesitation: Initially supportive, later cited logistical and financial hurdles.
• Public Anger: Hill communities view the delay as a betrayal, while Dehradun residents fear economic disruption.

Gairsain vs. Dehradun: The Heart of the Debate

Why Gairsain?

✅ Geographical Equity: Centrally located, ensuring equal access for hill districts.
✅ Symbolic Value: Embodies Uttarakhand’s hill identity and founding vision.
✅ Economic Potential: Could spur growth in underdeveloped regions.

Why Dehradun?

❌ Infrastructure Gap: Gairsain lacks hospitals, universities, and transport networks.
❌ Economic Reality: Dehradun’s established ecosystem supports governance and business.
❌ Political Indecision: No government has committed funds for a full transition.

25 Years Later: What’s Next?

As Uttarakhand enters its next chapter, the capital issue remains unresolved:

• Ongoing Protests: Groups like the Gairsain Capital Struggle Committee demand action.
• Symbolic Steps: The state built a Vidhan Sabha in Gairsain, but without capital status, it’s a hollow gesture.
• Election Rhetoric: With polls nearing, parties may revive promises—but will they act?

Conclusion: A Test of Uttarakhand’s Future

The capital debate is more than administrative—it’s about Uttarakhand’s identity. Should the state:
✔ Honor its hill roots with Gairsain?
✔ Prioritize practicality with Dehradun?

As Uttarakhand turns 25, its people deserve clarity. The delay risks eroding trust in leadership. The time for decisive action is now.

What’s your take? Should Gairsain be the capital, or is Dehradun the better choice? Share your thoughts below!

— By NextMinuteNews | November 9, 2025