Zohran Mamdani’s Swearing-In Sparks Debate Over Oath Choice
In a dramatic moment during Maharashtra’s MLA swearing-in ceremony, Zohran Mamdani (AIMIM) refused to take the oath on the Indian Constitution—yet his swearing-in proceeded without cancellation. Instead, Mamdani took the oath in the name of God, fueling debates on constitutional loyalty and religious identity in Indian politics.
What Happened During the Swearing-In?
The ceremony at Maharashtra Vidhan Bhavan saw most MLAs swear on the Constitution, but Mamdani, Byculla’s newly elected legislator, chose a religious affirmation. Critics accused him of disregarding constitutional values, while supporters defended his right to freedom of religion.
Mamdani responded:
“My faith guides me, but I fully respect the Constitution. My oath doesn’t change my commitment to the law or my constituents.”
Political Reactions: BJP Condemns, AIMIM Defends
- BJP’s stance: Maharashtra BJP spokesperson Ram Kadam called it an “attempt to undermine the Constitution” and demanded EC action.
- AIMIM’s support: Party chief Asaduddin Owaisi cited constitutional provisions allowing oaths in God’s name, calling the backlash “targeted hypocrisy.”
Legal Experts Weigh In
- Prashant Bhushan (Advocate): “The Third Schedule permits oaths in God’s name or solemn affirmation. Mamdani’s choice is legal.”
- Dr. Faizan Mustafa (Constitutional Scholar): “While legal, swearing on the Constitution holds symbolic importance for national unity.”
Public Opinion Split
Social media trends like #RespectTheConstitution and #MyOathMyChoice reflected division:
– Critics: Argue public officials must prioritize constitutional allegiance.
– Supporters: Stress that Mamdani’s performance matters more than his oath wording.
Who Is Zohran Mamdani?
A first-time MLA and minority rights advocate, Mamdani has focused on housing, education, and police reform. Supporters claim the oath controversy distracts from his platform.
Why This Controversy Matters
This incident underscores India’s struggle to balance secular governance with religious identity. As similar debates arise, Mamdani’s case sets a precedent for how oath-taking choices are perceived.
Final Takeaway
Mamdani’s swearing-in stood, but the dispute highlights tensions between personal faith and public duty. His legislative actions will now face scrutiny as India watches whether he upholds constitutional values in practice.
Stay updated with NextMinuteNews for further developments.
